Hoarding is not collection development
Follow us on:
Categories
Making a Collection Count

The Retarded Reader


Understanding and Helping the Retarded Reader
Strang
1965

Submitter: My local library has a small section on education help. Here is an ancient book from the proceedings of a conference on reading problems held in 1962. Scholarly, and not much help to a public patron who might be dealing with this issue.

Holly: This is in a public library? Whyyyyy?

More Help for the Challenged:

Steven is Retarded

Training Retarded Babies

Siblings of Retarded Children

Church for the Retarded

Crafts for the Retarded

15 Responses to The Retarded Reader

  • I don’t get it. What the heck does it mean “retard readers” with IQ’s from 165 to 170? If the range of “retarded” is from 75 to 170; IQ really doesn’t mean anything.

  • My first thought was “well they probably just meant delayed in the generic sense.” Then I saw the inside bit.
    Even if it was an advice book, and the title wasn’t horrible, I’m sure 50 year old techniques have at least been expanded, if not completely discarded.

  • Granted that this book belongs in a college library or a large central library, not in a neighborhood library, it clearly deals with issues beyond that we usually think of when we see The R Word, and hence the use of that word isn’t particularly objectionable. Think of it as meaning “people who lag behind peers in their reading skills”, not necessarily “people with intellectual disability”.

  • It’s interesting to watch what used to be correct and polite terms become insults. This is kinda like flipping through old magazines and seeing plus-size clothing ads call their clientele chubby.

    • And now people use it as a cruel label and an insult all the time. But what really makes my blood boil is when they use “autistic” as an insult, and there is nothing wrong with being autistic.Why are people cruel to others who can’t help being the way they are and pose little to not threat to them? 🙁

  • What!? No pictures?….

  • Embarrassing, sad.

  • i.q.’s to 165 or 170? you might want a second opinion on a diagnosis of retardation in that case…

    • I think they’re using “retarded reader” to mean what we call dyslexic now, i.e. you might be extremely intelligent but struggle with reading and writing.

    • I tested with a genius level IQ, was still put into “remedial reading” in first grade because I was struggling with it. Judging from what I see here that’s what they’re talking about. People who, despite being normal to high intelligence, still struggle with reading.

      • and spelling!

        • That too. I still struggle with spelling. Though some of my struggling actually has a lot to do with a bullying teacher who utterly destroyed my self esteem because I take a bath every day and she believed people should only bathe every three days. I (and many other students) left her class so torn down we all nearly flunked out of junior high. She ended up being demoted from 6th grade to 4th.

          People often talk about good teachers who helped encourage them. Few are brave enough to talk about the bad ones who tried to destroy them.

  • fromula and finn949, did you see my comment above? “Retarded” for the purposes of this particular book means “lagging behind peers in reading skills”. Someone with an IQ of 165-170 is hardly intellectually disabled, but may very well have dyslexia or some other learning disability

  • 165-170 in IQ is supposed to be mental retardation? I guess in their world, Albert Einstein would be considered “average”.